<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Cardinal Nation blog &#187; Brian Fuentes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thecardinalnationblog.com/category/players/noncards/bfuentes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thecardinalnationblog.com</link>
	<description>Brian Walton&#039;s news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals (TM) and their minor league system</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 12:39:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Top 20 Cardinals Stories of 2008: #11-15</title>
		<link>http://thecardinalnationblog.com/2008/12/29/top-20-cardinals-stories-of-2008-11-15/</link>
		<comments>http://thecardinalnationblog.com/2008/12/29/top-20-cardinals-stories-of-2008-11-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Walton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthony Reyes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Fuentes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colby Rasmus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Kissell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kyle McClellan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Luis Perdomo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Holliday]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skip Schumaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top Stories of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brian fuentes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecardinalnation.com/?p=477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian Walton’s look back at the biggest stories across the St. Louis Cardinal Nation during 2008 continues with those ranked 11 through 15.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><br />
</strong><br />
<img class="alignright" title="Kyle McClellan" src=" http://thecardinalnationblog.com/wp-content/uploads/ultimatebaseball/Mcclellan-debut-040108-ap.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" /><strong>15) The Emergence of <a href="http://stlcardinals.scout.com/a.z?s=321&amp;p=8&amp;c=1&amp;nid=3488922">Kyle McClellan</a> and <a href="http://stlcardinals.scout.com/a.z?s=321&amp;p=8&amp;c=1&amp;nid=3488989   ">Skip Schumaker</a></strong></p>
<p>Kicking off part two of this series is a segment with a pair of positive stories about two unexpected top contributors to the 2008 Cardinals. Only one was a true rookie as the other claimed a starting role for the first time after bit parts in three previous seasons.</p>
<p><strong>Kyle McClellan</strong> came into spring camp as seemingly the longest of long shots. He had been in the system since 2002, recovered from Tommy John surgery, been left exposed in the 2006 Rule 5 Draft and not taken and had accrued just 30 2/3 innings of pitching at the Double-A level and above coming into 2008.</p>
<p>Yet Pitching Coach <strong>Dave Duncan</strong> was intrigued by the right-hander&#8217;s four-pitch repertoire. During a solid spring, McClellan was moved from starting to relieving and was ultimately selected to come north with the big-league club.</p>
<p>The local St. Louis product would start strongly, being called upon in more and more important situations. As the season progressed, the 24-year-old&#8217;s results tailed off, however.</p>
<p>McClellan went on to make 68 appearances, second-most among National League rookies and third-most all-time among first-year Cardinals. He earned 32 holds, but was just 1-for-6 in save opportunities. McClellan earned the Cardinals Rookie of the Year Award, presented by the organization in September.</p>
<p>Moving forward, McClellan could be asked to return to the 2009 bullpen or be returned to starting.</p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="Skip Schumaker" src=" http://thecardinalnationblog.com/wp-content/uploads/ultimatebaseball/schu-ap-050208-2.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" /><strong>Skip Schumaker</strong> has been in the Cardinals system a year longer than McClellan, since 2001. While the 28-year-old made his MLB debut in June, 2005, he rode the Memphis shuttle for the next three seasons.</p>
<p>The left-handed hitter came into 2008 in his best shape ever and with a chance to assume the old <strong>So Taguchi</strong> spot, that of pinch-hitter and late-game defensive replacement, able to play all three outfield positions.</p>
<p>With a superb spring, Schumaker held off top prospect <strong>Colby Rasmus</strong>. He not only made the big club for the second consecutive year, but surpassed his previous peak by becoming a starter and lead-off man.</p>
<p>Injuries, first to <strong>Chris Duncan</strong> and later to <strong>Rick Ankiel</strong>, along with an ability to get on base (.359 OBP) helped cement Schumaker&#8217;s starting role. As a result, he received 540 at-bats, becoming a key contributor to the 2008 Cardinals in the process. Schumaker&#8217;s primary Achilles heel is an inability to hit left-handed pitchers (.168/.238/.185 in 119 at-bats last season).</p>
<p>With at least six outfielders legitimately positioned to contend for at most five jobs in 2009, nothing is assured for Schumaker going forward. Because he has exhausted all his option years, he cannot be sent down to the minor leagues without first being exposed to waivers.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="Colby Rasmus" src=" http://thecardinalnationblog.com/wp-content/uploads/ultimatebaseball/Rasmus-AB-200-150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" /><strong>14) <a href="http://stlcardinals.scout.com/a.z?s=321&amp;p=8&amp;c=1&amp;nid=3669627">Colby Rasmus</a>: Strong Spring, Lost Season</strong></p>
<p>Who hasn&#8217;t heard of the Cardinals top prospect in each of the last two, going on three seasons now?</p>
<p>A little over one year ago, then-new general manager <strong>John Mozeliak</strong> wanted popular but fading centerfielder <strong>Jim Edmonds</strong> to be gone badly enough that he was willing to pay San Diego $2 million just to take him away.</p>
<p>Many anticipated part two of the move to be the ascension of <strong>Colby Rasmus</strong> to replace Edmonds in 2008, this despite the 21-year-old having never played above Double-A. To say Rasmus&#8217; year didn&#8217;t evolve as anticipated would be a grand understatement.</p>
<p>The business reality of baseball reared its head when Rasmus did not come north with the Cardinals despite his solid showing during spring training. His primary competition from the left side, Skip Schumaker, had an equally impressive spring, earning the leadoff role on the 2008 Cardinals.</p>
<p>Rasmus, upset over not making the team, headed straight to Memphis and into a deep funk. He crawled into June with a 2008 regular-season OPS considerably under .700. Further complicating matters, his father received wide notoriety due to a series of critical comments posted on our Scout.com message board.</p>
<p>In June, Colby blistered the ball, with an OPS of .976. That same period, fellow Memphis outfielders <strong>Joe Mather </strong>and<strong> Nick Stavinoha</strong> each made their MLB debuts instead of the top prospect, earned though solid performances over a longer period this season.</p>
<p>On July 1, Rasmus was added to the Team USA Olympics squad, which by default would either keep him in the minors or he would have to give up his spot. Within ten days, a groin injury put the outfielder onto the disabled list, making it a moot point. Rasmus didn&#8217;t return until late August when he played in three games each in the Gulf Coast League and Florida State League.</p>
<p>It was too little, too late for the Alabama native in 2008.</p>
<p>Despite the Cardinals being short-handed in the outfield with Duncan, Ankiel and Mather out, Rasmus did not receive the call to make his MLB debut in September. In the estimation of manager <strong>Tony La Russa</strong>, Colby hadn&#8217;t played enough during the season to warrant the move.</p>
<p>Cardinals Vice President of Amateur Scouting and Player Development <strong>Jeff Luhnow</strong> spoke to MLB.com in September about Rasmus.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I think he&#8217;s going to focus 100 percent on being ready for Spring Training and making this club,&#8221; Luhnow said. &#8220;That&#8217;s where his head needs to be. Forget who&#8217;s posted what online, or what people are saying about what he&#8217;s doing or not doing. He and I had a good long chat [Tuesday], and I believe he&#8217;s got the right attitude.</p>
<p>&#8220;When you talk to him directly, he has one goal and one goal only, and he&#8217;s pretty focused on it. I tried to communicate to him that I have that same goal. That we all do, really.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>2008 was basically a lost year for Rasmus, with nothing considerably different today versus 12 months ago other than the uneven Triple-A experience. As of yet, Colby is not required to be added to the 40-man roster and just as was the case last year, remains a long-shot to make the Cardinals out of 2009 spring training.</p>
<p>So far, Rasmus has been rumored to be virtually untouchable when other clubs make trade inquiries. Once upon a time, the subject of the next top story was in a similar place.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="Anthony Reyes" src=" http://thecardinalnationblog.com/wp-content/uploads/ultimatebaseball/reyes-052006-200-150.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" /><strong>13) The End of the <a href="http://stlcardinals.scout.com/a.z?s=321&amp;p=8&amp;c=1&amp;nid=3894899">Anthony Reyes</a> Era</strong></p>
<p>Depending on how you look at it, the official date for this event might have been July 26 or perhaps December 11. Others argue the die had been cast several years earlier.</p>
<p>Prior to Rasmus, the Cardinals&#8217; most celebrated prospect was a former right-handed pitcher from the University of Southern California, <strong>Anthony Reyes</strong>. Only because of injury concerns and signability questions was Reyes on the board when the Cards took him in the 15th round of the 2003 draft.</p>
<p>By 2005 and 2006 as he steadily moved up the line, Reyes was considered the top prospect in the Cardinals system. The possessor of a blistering fastball was called upon to replace the forgettable <strong>Sidney Ponson</strong> in May, 2006 and would go on to make 17 starts in the majors in his rookie season.</p>
<p>Reyes&#8217; crowning moment as a Cardinal was in Game 1 of the 2006 World Series in Detroit. The Cards, major underdogs to the Tigers, took the opener behind eight-plus innings of two-run baseball by Reyes. He holds the record for fewest career wins (six) by any Game 1 Series starter in the history of the game.</p>
<p>His 2007 began with a solid 3-0, 2.70 ERA in spring training, and concluded in a historic manner, but not in a positive sense. Reyes took ten consecutive defeats to start the regular season, tying the club record set in 1898. In between more time in Memphis and ending the season in the bullpen, Reyes&#8217; .125 winning percentage (2-14 record) tied the franchise&#8217;s single-season futility record, established in 1896.</p>
<p>Though he did not make the 2008 rotation, Reyes was placed on the club to start the season as a reliever. Whispers of a difference of opinion between the front office and the coaching staff ensued. Reyes was demoted to Memphis for the fifth time in the last two years on May 5, making room for <strong>Mike Parisi</strong>&#8216;s MLB starting debut.</p>
<p>Reyes arrived back from Triple-A in mid-June but was scratched from his first start with right elbow inflammation. Once his rehab was complete, Reyes remained with Memphis until the July 26 trade to Cleveland.</p>
<p>All the Cardinals received in return was a 24-year-old reliever named <strong>Luis Perdomo</strong>, assigned to Double-A Springfield. The Cards thought so little of the Dominican Republic native that they left him exposed in December&#8217;s Rule 5 Draft, where he was taken by the San Francisco Giants for $50,000.</p>
<p>With that, the final tie to the Reyes era in St. Louis is officially gone. All that remains are some mixed memories, a feeling that things could and should have been different and the mere pittance of $50,000.</p>
<p>Not mentioned in the above was the ever-present 800-pound gorilla during Reyes&#8217; entire stay in St. Louis. Of course, that is the widely-reported difference in opinion regarding the right-hander&#8217;s pitching style that placed La Russa and Duncan in one corner and Reyes in the other.</p>
<p>I was with the Cardinals at the time of the trade and <a href="http://stlcardinals.scout.com/2/772633.html">recorded La Russa&#8217;s remarks</a> from his office. Here is an excerpt, during which the pitcher and the media were assigned ample helpings of blame.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;I regret some of the nonsense that became a distraction about his style of pitching didn&#8217;t match. That didn&#8217;t work in his advantage. You just don&#8217;t need distractions when you are trying to be&#8230; I am talking about veterans; it doesn&#8217;t make any difference&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;I regret the fact that people brought up the fact that they didn&#8217;t think he was the right kind of pitcher. Dave Duncan gives every pitcher that comes here his absolute best shot, which has been proven over time to do as good of a job as anybody. It was a story line that kept getting pushed that he wasn&#8217;t Dave&#8217;s kind of pitcher. No.</p>
<p>&#8220;You can&#8217;t pitch there (gesturing high in the zone). You have to pitch here (middle) and there (low). Everything that Dave told him is what he tells all these guys. It can happen to anybody when you are younger. It can distract you,&#8221; said La Russa.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now 27 years of age, Reyes is penciled into the Tribe&#8217;s 2009 rotation. His post-trade, six-start American League debut went fabulously, as he posted a 2-1 record with a 1.83 ERA upon a late-season recall from Triple-A.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="Brian Fuentes" src=" http://thecardinalnationblog.com/wp-content/uploads/ultimatebaseball/fuentes-ap.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" /><strong>12) The Rockies Deals that Weren&#8217;t: <a href="http://stlcardinals.scout.com/2/810016.html">Matt Holliday</a> and <a href="http://stlcardinals.scout.com/2/820297.html">Brian Fuentes</a></strong></p>
<p>On numerous occasions, La Russa has asked for a power bat to hit behind <strong>Albert Pujols</strong> in the Cardinals batting order and recently, he has reinforced his desire for a proven closer.</p>
<p>This past summer, two members of the floundering, yet defending NL champion Colorado Rockies were linked to the Cardinals. Outfielder <strong>Matt Holliday </strong>was one year away from becoming a <strong>Scott Boras</strong>-led free agent while the contract of closer <strong>Brian Fuentes</strong> (pictured) would conclude at the end of 2008.</p>
<p>While neither became a Cardinal last summer, nor did any other significant player, unless you count the temporary addition of Washington castoff <strong>Felipe Lopez</strong>.</p>
<p>Before Holliday was dealt by the Rockies to a surprise suitor, the Oakland A&#8217;s, on November 12, the Cardinals reportedly offered three players for him. Outfielders <strong>Ryan Ludwick</strong> and Skip Schumaker and starting pitcher <strong>Mitchell Boggs</strong> were the players rumored to possibly be heading west.</p>
<p>Moving two outfielders for one would have relieved some of the outfield logjam. Yet after the emergence of Ludwick last season, there was considerable public debate over how much of an upgrade Holliday would offer offensively.</p>
<p>Another important factor was money. Holliday is set to be paid $13.5 million next season, while Ludwick can remain under club control for three more seasons and will likely make a third or less of Holliday&#8217;s 2009 take.</p>
<p>The Cardinals haven&#8217;t done any better trying to get Brian Fuentes, though it has been for different reasons.</p>
<p>A lack of confidence in emerging closer <strong>Chris Perez </strong>and 2009 rookie-to-be <strong>Jason Motte </strong>left La Russa to proclaim Fuentes as the Cardinals&#8217; top priority during the early December Winter Meetings.</p>
<p>It is true that being left-handed and a closer would meet two of the Cards&#8217; stated needs, yet drawing that high of a profile may or may not have been the manner in which Mozeliak would have preferred to play his hand. Still, the GM backed up the proclamation with a two-year offer reported to be in the $16-$18 million range.</p>
<p>Fuentes didn&#8217;t bite, stating he prefers to play in his home state of California with the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim. The Halos lost their closer, <strong>Francisco Rodriguez</strong>, to the Mets as a free agent. If they ante more money and/or the third year Fuentes desires, that deal should get done.</p>
<p>In the meantime, the second-fiddle Cardinals have grown tired of waiting and may have withdrawn their offer entirely.</p>
<p>Rarely, if ever, has so much ink been spilled in and around St. Louis over two players that actually never became Cardinals.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignright" title="George Kissell" src=" http://thecardinalnationblog.com/wp-content/uploads/ultimatebaseball/Kissell-bunt-ap.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" /><strong>11) The Passing of George Kissell </strong>(<a href="http://stlcardinals.scout.com/2/798766.html">link one</a>) (<a href=" http://stlcardinals.scout.com/2/821450.html">link two</a>)<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>George Kissell </strong>was undoubtedly the greatest Cardinal organization man of the latter half of the 1900&#8242;s, that despite few fans having ever heard of him.</p>
<p>The 88-year-old&#8217;s official title was senior field coordinator for player development, but he was more commonly known as the man who taught thousands of farmhands how to play the game the Cardinals way for over a half-century.</p>
<p>Before perishing in October due to injuries suffered in an automobile accident, Kissell served the organization for 69 years. Most recently, he assisted the Cardinals&#8217; minor league affiliates and handled instructional duties for the minor leagues during spring training and extended spring training.</p>
<p>Kissell began by spending ten years in the minor leagues as an infielder and worked in many capacities since 1940. From 1946 to 1968, he was a manager, coach, scout and minor league instructor. Kissell was on the Major League coaching staff from 1969 to 1975 and was special field assistant to General Manager <strong>Bing Devine</strong> in 1976.</p>
<p>In 2005, the Cardinals unveiled a plaque outside the clubhouse at the Cardinals Complex in Jupiter to honor Kissell which reads, in part: &#8220;Every player in the Cardinals&#8217; Organization since 1940 has had contact with George Kissell and they have all been better for it. &#8230; Well known for his emphasis on fundamentals, George taught several generations of Redbirds how to play baseball.&#8221;</p>
<p>Further, in a December memorial service in Kissell&#8217;s former home of St. Petersburg, Florida, Cardinals chairman <strong>Bill DeWitt, Jr.</strong> proclaimed that the club&#8217;s four practice fields in Jupiter would be named in Kissell&#8217;s honor.</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Already posted:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://thecardinalnationblog.com/2008/12/23/cards-2008-top-stories-16-thru-20/"><strong>Top 20 Cardinals Stories of 2008: #16-20</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Coming soon:</strong></p>
<p>Top 20 Cardinals Stories of 2008: #6-10</p>
<p>Top 20 Cardinals Stories of 2008: #1-5</p>
<p>Projected Top St. Louis Cardinals Stories of 2009</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Top+20+Cardinals+Stories+of+2008%3A+%2311-15+http%3A%2F%2Fthecardinalnationblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D477" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://thecardinalnationblog.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Top+20+Cardinals+Stories+of+2008%3A+%2311-15+http%3A%2F%2Fthecardinalnationblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D477" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecardinalnationblog.com/2008/12/29/top-20-cardinals-stories-of-2008-11-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looper arbitration decision could impact Fuentes</title>
		<link>http://thecardinalnationblog.com/2008/12/16/looper-impacts-fuentes/</link>
		<comments>http://thecardinalnationblog.com/2008/12/16/looper-impacts-fuentes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brian Walton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Braden Looper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Fuentes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roberto De La Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[braden looper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brian fuentes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roberto de la cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Cardinals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thecardinalnation.com/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cost of acquiring Brian Fuentes or any other Type A free agent went up due to the Cardinals’ decision to not offer Braden Looper arbitration. Is it part of a bigger plan?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">In recent days, two of the most talked about subjects surrounding the St. Louis Cardinals have been the cases of free agent closer <strong>Brian Fuentes</strong> and starting pitcher <strong>Braden Looper</strong> – one potentially coming into town with the other likely leaving. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">In what follows, I will explain how these two seemingly-isolated cases are anything but.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Aftershocks of the decision to not offer Looper arbitration include either the Cardinals not signing any Type A free agents such as Fuentes or gutting the early part of their 2009 draft. There is also a significant financial ramification that may or may not impact the organization’s Latin American program.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><img title="Braden Looper and Brian Fuentes" src="http://thecardinalnation.com/wp-content/uploads/ultimatebaseball/looper fuentes 150 200.jpg" alt="Looper and Fuentes" width="200" height="150" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Looper and Fuentes</p></div>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Losing Looper</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Though the Looper decision was not assumed prior to the December 1 deadline, many observers, including me, expected the Cards would offer him. Yet, Looper was probably pleased to be cut loose. Seeing <strong>Kyle Lohse</strong> snare a four-year deal worth $41 million likely helped Braden realize some time ago that his chance to score a similar multi-year contract would not be with St. Louis. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><strong>Chris Carpenter, Adam Wainwright </strong>and now Lohse have long-term contracts, with <strong>Todd Wellemeyer</strong> coming up for consideration in 12 months. That is potentially too many starters tied up for too long, leaving Looper on the outside looking in. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Despite concerns about the economic downturn everywhere, Looper seemed assured of getting a better deal somewhere other than a one-year, arbitration-driven deal with the Cardinals. As a result, it was generally expected that the shaky closer-turned solid starter would have turned down the opportunity for a one-year deal with the Cards via arbitration.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The Cardinals didn’t care about expectations. They were apparently worried that Looper might accept despite the seemingly low risk of its occurrence. Therefore, they took the only route to absolutely assure that wouldn’t happen – they cut their formal ties with the pitcher. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">With no guarantee that injured ace Carpenter will be ready to go to start next season and how many innings they will get from him, the Cardinals seem to be in the market for some insurance for their starting rotation. Their top five are currently Carpenter, Wainwright, Lohse, Wellemeyer and <strong>Joel Pineiro.</strong> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">If the organization does want that insurance, it seemingly won’t be delivered via Looper, unless the two sides come back around to each other later in the off-season.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Extra pick lost</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Though I believe the Cardinals were unnecessarily cautious in this situation, I am frankly less concerned about keeping Looper than I am about the downstream ramifications of the decision.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">As a Type B free agent, had Looper been offered but not accepted, the Cardinals would have received a compensatory draft pick commonly called a “sandwich” pick that can be used between the first and second rounds of the June, 2009 draft. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Since the Cardinals did not make that offer to Looper (or <strong>Jason Isringhausen</strong> or <strong>Russ Springer</strong>), they were not awarded that selection. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana;">A change in plans?</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">From an organization that has highly-prioritized the long-term mission of building their farm system, bypassing the likely compensatory pick for Looper seems a surprisingly counter-strategic decision. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">If fact, 2009 will be the first time since 2004, before <strong>Jeff Luhnow</strong> assumed the role of farm director for the Cardinals, that they will have no extra picks coming into the draft.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Perhaps anticipating this kind of move, not ninety days ago, I asked Luhnow if the Cardinals could ever have too many compensatory picks. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">“No, absolutely not. Those picks are valuable and you just have to figure out how to turn those assets into something that you need. I am speaking as the scouting director now, but even speaking with my global hat on, we like those draft picks and will take as many as we can get,” Luhnow declared.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Fear of being locked into arbitration with their compensation-eligible free agents clearly altered the organization’s intent this year. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Yet, the Cardinals are not unique. Along with St. Louis, at least ten other clubs, perhaps concerned about the economy, excluded all their six-year-plus veteran free agents from arbitration offers. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana;">No sandwiches would leave system hungrier</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">To provide a reminder of the quality of players that have joined the Cardinals as supplemental picks, I offer their most recent sandwich round selections, with the bonus amounts awarded each: </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">2008: <strong>Lance Lynn </strong>- $938,000</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">2007: <strong>Clayton Mortensen</strong> &#8211; $650,000</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">2006: <strong>Chris Perez</strong> &#8211; $800,000</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">2005: <strong>Mark McCormick</strong> &#8211; $800,000 and <strong>Tyler Herron</strong> &#8211; $650,000</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">All in all, would the Cards rather have these players than not? It would certainly seem like it. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Though the jury is still out on the 2005 and 2008 sandwich players, the major league club already began reaping the benefits of Perez less than two years after he was pitching in the College World Series. Mortensen is also on the fact track to the big leagues, starting in Triple-A before he had even one full year of professional experience. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana;">A misdirection play being run?</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">As they pump more money into their growing Latin American operations, could the Cardinals be changing their strategy by passing up comp picks, while routing more money away from the June draft in the process? </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Think of it this way. Had the Cardinals landed 16-year-old Venezuelan centerfielder <strong>Yorman Rodriguez</strong> in August instead of former GM <strong>Walt Jocketty’</strong>s Cincinnati Reds, by my calculations, the Cards would have spent more 2008 bonus money overseas than they did in the regular First-Year Player Draft. The Reds reportedly dished out $2.7 million to Rodriguez, a record for a Venezuelan-born player.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Furthermore, consider the Cardinals’ top 2008 international signing, <strong>Roberto De La Cruz</strong>. The third baseman received more in bonus than any other Cards player taken in this June’s First-Year Player Draft not named <strong>Brett Wallace</strong>, a polished college hitter five years older than he. In fact, the Dominican Republic native fetched the same bonus as the number 29 pick in the first round! </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"><span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Since at least 2005 and probably much longer, only Wallace and <strong>Pete Kozma</strong> (2007) received more in bonus from the club than did De La Cruz. Among the recent first-rounders who brought home less than the third baseman are <strong>Adam Ottavino</strong> (2006) and <strong>Colby Rasmus </strong>(2005). </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">That is uncharted territory for an organization that didn’t even have an international presence outside of the Dominican   Republic just a few short years ago. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Increasing confidence in growing overseas budget</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">I asked the Vice President of Amateur Scouting and Player Development about the significance of the escalation of the Cardinals’ international spending on players and whether my estimate of their shifting balance toward a majority spent in Latin America and a minority in the US is accurate.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">“Correct. There are a couple of clubs teetering on that edge and a couple that have already gone over (spending more outside the US). We wouldn’t be afraid to do that.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">“I think <strong>Mr. DeWitt</strong> and <strong>Mo</strong> now have the confidence that we have the right scouting resources in place and the right infrastructure in place that it makes sense to deploy the bonus dollars there and wait for the return. It is a bit more of a long term investment, so you have to look at the whole portfolio,” Luhnow explained. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Type A free agent signing carries big downside</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The final ramification of not having that supplemental selection is that the Cardinals may be more reluctant to sign Fuentes or any other of one of the top free agents, called Type A, this despite the club needing help at several positions at the major league level.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Examples of Type A players offered arbitration that might previously have been on the Cardinals shopping list include:</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Infielders <strong>Orlando Hudson</strong> and <strong>Orlando Cabrera</strong></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Left-handed relievers Fuentes and <strong>Darren Oliver</strong> (AA*)</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Starting pitchers <strong>A.J. Burnett</strong> (SS**), <strong>Derek Lowe</strong> and <strong>Oliver Perez</strong></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Outfielders <strong>Raul Ibanez</strong> (SS**) and <strong>Milton Bradley</strong> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">* arbitration offered</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">** signed since</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">(The above list excludes high-end Type A’s that were in the same situation but likely priced outside the Cardinals budget, players such as <strong>C.C. Sabathia, Ben Sheets, Manny Ramirez, Mark Teixeira</strong> and <strong>Francisco Rodriguez</strong>. (Yeah, I heard the rumors about an offer to K-Rod, but I don’t believe them.)</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The Looper situation indirectly suggested that the remainng Type A players have an uphill chance of becoming Cardinals in 2009. Either the players accepted the offer of arbitration, as did Oliver, taking them off the market by tying them to their old clubs, or if they declined, compensation from the signing organization will be required. As an aside, of the 25 players offered this year, only Oliver and Cincinnati’s <strong>David Weathers </strong>accepted. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">If the Cardinals do go ahead and sign any Type A, it would seem their plan to focus on improving the farm system via the First-Year Player Draft would be taking a one-year hiatus as a result.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Again, here’s why. If a Type A signing is made, the Cardinals would forfeit their first round pick for next June. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Is signing a Type A worse than not?</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">We’ve already seen why the Cards will have no supplemental pick in 2009. Add to that the potential loss of their first-rounder in this scenario and the chances of the organization nabbing an impact player in the 2009 draft will be greatly diminished.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Though the specifics of the supplemental round are not yet defined, I currently estimate the Cardinals’ second-round pick should be somewhere between 65th and 70th. That would be their very first selection in the 2009 draft in this case. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Not pretty, nor is it a normal situation for the Cardinals.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">In fact, the last year the Cards went into a June draft without either a first-rounder or a supplemental first-round pick was way back in 2002. That was due to the club having signed Type A free agents Isringhausen and <strong>Tino Martinez</strong> during the previous off-season. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The 2002 scenario could repeat this year if the Cards signed two Type As such as Fuentes and Perez. Losing both their first and second-round picks would ensue. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Rewriting history isn’t pretty</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">In a world where the Cards would have no first or sandwich round picks, their top selections in recent drafts would have been the following players. They represent the organization’s initial second-round picks in these years:</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">2008: <strong>Shane Peterson</strong></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">2007: <strong>David Kopp</strong> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">2006: <strong>Brad Furnish</strong></span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">2005: <strong>Josh Wilson</strong> (retired)</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Nothing against any of these young men, but would anyone feel as good as they do about the much-ballyhooed improvement in the Cardinals system had these players been the organization’s highest picks in the last four drafts?</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Methinks not. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Money potentially saved</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">If one subscribes to this action being a part of an expense-adjustment strategy on the part of the Cardinals, consider this. The organization could avoid spending as much as $2 million next June just by not having to bonus both a first-round and a sandwich pick. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Another potential factor is sheer roster space to put all their players. While the Cardinals’ system is the youngest of the 30 organizations in aggregate, it is reaching its capacity, says Luhnow. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">With fewer minor league free agents and better quality players, it is becoming more difficult to determine who should be pruned from the system. As a result, fewer can enter.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Here is Luhnow’s recent observation. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">“I look at next year’s draft and look at all the players in our system and I am not sure we are going to need to sign as many as we did this year. I said that this year, too, so we will have to see,” the farm director explained.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">There are several potential ways to achieve financial benefits. For example, they could shave off the high-end picks as discussed here, they could draft more players with signability issues, and/or they could refuse to pay over slot value for any draftees.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><strong><span style="font-family: Verdana;">In conclusion</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">The Cardinals’ decision to not offer Braden Looper arbitration either eliminates their signing of a Type A free agent or dooms them to waiting and waiting to make their first 2009 draft selection until the 65-70 range.</span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">There is a possibility that the club could divert unspent bonus money into their Latin American signing budget, but that is not assured. </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoPlainText"><span style="font-family: Verdana;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Looper+arbitration+decision+could+impact+Fuentes+http%3A%2F%2Fthecardinalnationblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D232" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://thecardinalnationblog.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Looper+arbitration+decision+could+impact+Fuentes+http%3A%2F%2Fthecardinalnationblog.com%2F%3Fp%3D232" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thecardinalnationblog.com/2008/12/16/looper-impacts-fuentes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

