The 2010 Cardinals seem to play worse after having a day off than they did just prior.
Much concern has been expressed by St. Louis Cardinals fans about the meat grinder of a schedule that awaits the club over the final weeks of the regular season. If the Florida Marlins August 8 rainout reschedule lands on September 20 as expected, the Cardinals will play 44 games in their final 45 days.
Thursday the 19th is the Cardinals second off day this week and fourth open date in the last two weeks – five if the rainout is counted.
Conventional wisdom says a team welcomes the time away and the rested club plays better afterward. The opposite view is that rhythms and routines are interrupted and days off can be disruptive.
Wondering which is the case for the 2010 Cardinals, I undertook a very unscientific study. I simply looked at the team’s record in the series or partial series just prior to each of their first 15 days off and compared it to their results in the series immediately after.
2010 Cardinals, series record after days off compared to before
|Days off||Better after||Same after||Worse after|
In just one-fifth of the time did the Cardinals win more games immediately after a day off compared to how they were playing just prior. In four cases, they played at same rate before and after. That leaves over half, eight of the 15 times, in which the Cardinals actually played worse just after taking a day off than they had been prior.
In terms of individual games, the Cards are six games over .500 just ahead of a day off and six games under after a rest.
Here are the specifics.
|Before||day off||After||day off|
I don’t know if this is simply coincidence, but if it really mattered, the long stretch of consecutive days ahead just might turn out to be a good thing.
Latest posts by Brian Walton (see all)
- The Case Against a 30-Man MLB Roster - April 30, 2017
- Cardinals Hall of Fame Class of 2017 to be Announced Friday - April 27, 2017
- Talking Cardinals Prospects on KFNS - April 20, 2017