The Cardinal Nation blog

Brian Walton's news and commentary on the St. Louis Cardinals (TM) and their minor league system

Molina snaps out of it

St. Louis Cardinals catcher Yadier Molina has resumed driving in runs.

Yadier Molina (AP/Gene J. Puscar)Coming off a 7-for-72 pre-break slump which saw his batting average drop to an embarrassingly-low .223, St. Louis Cardinals catcher Yadier Molina was due for a turn of luck. Thursday and Friday marked just the second time this season, and the first time since late April, that Molina had had back-to-back multi-hit games.

In the first contest following the All-Star Game, Molina knocked in two runs, followed by four on Friday, when he hit a two-run home run and added a single. It was the catcher’s second four-RBI game this season and fifth in his career. 17 times since Tony La Russa became manager in 1996 a Cardinals catcher has driven in at least four.

Thanks to Tom Orf for the data that follows, which indicate the most RBI by a Cardinals catcher in a single game since at least 1920 is seven, by Ken O’Dea on May 3, 1942. Ted Simmons had 25 four-RBI contests between 1971 and 1980.

Four or more RBI games, St. Louis Cardinals catchers, since 1920

Player Date Opp Rslt PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB IBB SO
Yadier Molina 7/16/2010 LAD W 8-4 4 4 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Yadier Molina 4/5/2010 CIN W 11-6 5 4 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 1
Yadier Molina 8/22/2008 ATL W 18-3 6 5 2 4 0 0 0 4 1 1 0
Jason LaRue 6/29/2008 KCR W 9-6 4 4 1 2 0 1 1 4 0 0 0
Gary Bennett 8/27/2006 CHC W 10-6 5 2 1 1 0 0 1 4 2 1 0
Yadier Molina 8/7/2006 CIN W 13-1 5 5 1 2 1 0 1 4 0 0 0
Yadier Molina 5/25/2005 PIT W 11-5 4 4 2 4 2 0 0 4 0 0 0
Mike Matheny 6/27/2004 KCR W 10-3 5 5 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Mike Matheny 8/2/2003 NYM W 10-9 4 3 1 1 1 0 0 4 1 1 0
Mike Matheny 4/8/2003 COL W 15-12 7 6 1 3 0 0 1 4 1 0 0
Eli Marrero 7/19/2002 PIT L 9-12 5 4 3 3 2 0 1 4 1 0 0
Eli Marrero 5/25/2002 PIT W 6-3 4 4 0 2 2 0 0 4 0 0 0
Mike Matheny 5/20/2000 PIT W 19-4 6 5 2 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Eli Marrero 4/20/2000 SDP W 14-1 5 5 2 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
Tom Lampkin 4/9/1998 COL W 7-5 4 3 1 2 0 0 1 4 1 0 0
Tom Lampkin 4/7/1998 COL W 12-11 5 5 2 3 1 0 1 4 0 0 1
Tom Pagnozzi 5/17/1996 COL L 11-12 5 5 2 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0
Tom Pagnozzi 6/18/1994 PIT W 9-0 4 4 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Hector Villanueva 6/3/1993 CIN W 9-2 5 5 1 3 1 0 1 5 0 0 1
Tom Pagnozzi 5/26/1991 NYM W 14-4 6 6 0 4 1 1 0 6 0 0 0
Todd Zeile 6/15/1990 MON L 4-7 4 3 1 2 0 0 1 4 1 0 1
Todd Zeile 4/13/1990 PHI W 11-0 5 5 2 2 1 0 1 4 0 0 0
Tony Pena 8/22/1989 ATL W 10-5 5 4 0 3 1 0 0 5 0 0 1
Tony Pena 8/8/1987 PHI W 9-5 5 4 1 2 0 0 1 4 1 1 0
Tom Pagnozzi 5/17/1987 CIN W 10-2 4 3 2 1 0 0 1 4 1 1 0
Mike Heath 6/21/1986 PHI W 8-6 5 5 1 2 1 0 0 4 0 0 1
Mike Heath 5/31/1986 CIN W 11-2 5 5 1 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 1
Darrell Porter 7/18/1984 SFG W 8-4 6 4 1 1 0 0 1 4 2 1 1
Darrell Porter 5/7/1984 LAD W 5-1 4 4 1 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 1
Darrell Porter 1983-07-04 (2) PIT W 11-4 5 4 1 1 0 0 1 4 1 0 1
Darrell Porter 5/30/1983 CIN W 9-1 4 4 1 2 0 1 1 4 0 0 1
Jamie Quirk 5/29/1983 HOU W 7-3 4 3 1 2 0 0 1 4 1 0 0
Darrell Porter 5/10/1983 SFG W 8-4 4 4 2 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
Gene Tenace 8/23/1982 LAD W 11-3 5 4 1 3 1 0 0 4 1 0 1
Darrell Porter 9/17/1981 MON W 7-4 4 4 1 2 1 0 1 5 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 9/25/1980 PIT W 10-2 5 4 3 3 0 0 2 6 1 0 0
Ted Simmons 9/2/1980 CIN W 12-4 5 5 2 2 1 1 0 4 0 0 1
Ted Simmons 8/6/1980 PHI W 14-0 5 5 1 4 2 0 0 4 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 5/9/1980 LAD W 15-7 5 4 2 2 0 0 1 5 1 0 0
Ted Simmons 5/2/1980 HOU W 9-1 4 2 2 1 0 0 1 4 1 0 0
Terry Kennedy 1979-07-01 (1) PHI W 13-7 5 4 1 2 0 0 1 4 1 1 1
Ted Simmons 6/11/1979 LAD W 9-7 5 5 2 3 0 0 2 6 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 4/27/1977 CHC W 21-3 4 3 1 2 0 0 0 4 1 1 0
Ted Simmons 4/20/1977 NYM W 4-2 4 4 1 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Joe Ferguson 1976-09-15 (1) NYM W 7-0 4 4 1 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 9/7/1975 NYM W 12-4 5 5 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 8/23/1975 ATL W 7-2 4 3 1 1 0 0 1 4 1 0 0
Ted Simmons 5/17/1975 SFG W 17-2 6 5 2 3 0 1 1 5 1 0 0
Ted Simmons 4/17/1975 NYM L 7-14 5 4 2 2 0 0 2 4 1 0 0
Ted Simmons 9/22/1974 CHC W 6-5 5 4 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 8/9/1974 LAD W 5-3 3 3 1 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 5/17/1974 CHC W 9-8 5 4 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 5/15/1974 NYM W 10-1 5 5 2 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 7/31/1973 MON W 10-5 5 5 2 2 1 0 1 4 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 7/2/1973 PHI W 7-4 4 4 1 2 0 0 1 5 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 6/27/1973 PIT W 15-4 6 4 2 3 2 0 1 5 1 0 0
Ted Simmons 6/6/1973 SDP W 6-3 4 4 1 3 1 0 1 4 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 9/15/1972 PIT W 10-4 5 4 2 2 1 0 0 4 1 0 0
Ted Simmons 6/10/1972 SDP W 5-2 4 4 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Ted Simmons 5/18/1972 CHC L 4-6 5 4 0 3 0 0 0 4 1 0 1
Ted Simmons 5/10/1972 HOU L 7-10 4 3 1 1 0 0 1 4 1 1 0
Ted Simmons 7/11/1971 HOU W 7-3 5 4 1 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 0
Jerry McNertney 5/26/1971 CHC W 9-4 4 4 1 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Joe Torre 6/27/1970 PHI W 9-8 4 4 2 2 1 0 1 4 0 0 0
Tim McCarver 4/26/1969 PHI W 10-4 5 5 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Tim McCarver 6/14/1967 PIT W 7-4 4 4 1 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Tim McCarver 8/16/1965 MLN L 8-10 4 4 1 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Tim McCarver 1963-06-09 (2) NYM W 10-4 4 4 2 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Carl Sawatski 5/9/1962 SFG W 7-3 4 4 1 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Jimmie Schaffer 6/30/1961 CHC W 11-4 3 3 1 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 1
Hal Smith 1960-06-26 (2) PHI W 4-3 4 4 1 2 1 0 1 4 0 0 0
Hal Smith 9/22/1959 LAD W 11-10 5 4 1 1 0 0 1 4 1 0 0
Hal Smith 5/9/1959 CHC W 11-1 4 4 2 2 0 0 2 5 0 0 0
Hal Smith 5/17/1958 LAD W 10-1 4 4 0 2 0 1 0 4 0 0 0
Hal Smith 9/3/1957 CIN W 14-4 5 5 1 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 0
Hal Smith 5/8/1957 NYG W 13-4 5 5 1 3 0 0 1 6 0 0 0
Walker Cooper 8/3/1956 BRO W 11-8 6 6 2 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Bill Sarni 6/2/1956 PHI L 4-6 4 4 0 3 1 0 0 4 0 0 0
Bill Sarni 4/19/1956 CIN L 9-10 5 5 2 2 0 0 2 4 0 0 0
Bill Sarni 6/6/1954 PHI L 8-11 5 4 2 3 1 0 1 4 0 0 0
Del Rice 6/23/1953 NYG W 15-8 5 3 2 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 1
Del Rice 8/7/1951 PIT W 16-7 5 3 2 2 1 0 1 4 1 0 1
Del Rice 1950-07-19 (1) NYG W 18-4 5 3 2 2 1 0 1 5 1 0 0
Joe Garagiola 1950-05-28 (2) CIN W 7-2 4 4 1 3 1 0 1 4 0 0 0
Del Rice 8/14/1948 PIT W 6-3 4 4 1 1 0 0 1 4 0 0
Del Wilber 8/2/1948 NYG W 21-5 6 6 2 3 1 0 0 5 0 0
Del Rice 5/20/1948 BRO W 13-4 5 4 0 2 2 0 0 4 0 1
Joe Garagiola 4/30/1948 CIN W 13-7 5 4 2 3 0 0 1 4 1 0
Del Rice 8/19/1947 BRO W 11-3 5 5 2 3 2 0 1 4 0 1
Del Rice 8/5/1947 CHC W 8-2 5 3 1 1 0 0 1 4 2 0
Ken O’Dea 1944-06-21 (2) CHC W 7-2 5 4 2 2 0 0 1 4 1 0
Walker Cooper 1943-08-22 (1) BSN W 6-1 5 5 1 3 2 0 1 5 0 0
Walker Cooper 1943-06-20 (1) CHC W 10-9 5 5 0 3 1 0 0 4 0 0
Walker Cooper 1943-05-23 (1) NYG W 6-5 5 5 1 3 0 0 1 4 0 0
Walker Cooper 5/18/1942 NYG W 16-4 6 5 1 2 2 0 0 4 1 1
Ken O’Dea 1942-05-03 (1) BRO W 14-10 5 5 1 2 1 0 1 7 0 2
Don Padgett 7/30/1940 BSN W 13-5 5 5 1 4 1 1 0 4 0 0
Mickey Owen 5/29/1940 CHC W 8-2 4 4 1 2 2 0 0 4 0 0
Mickey Owen 1939-08-06 (1) PHI W 11-0 5 5 0 3 1 0 0 4 0 0
Don Padgett 7/27/1939 NYG W 9-4 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 4 0 0
Don Padgett 7/26/1939 NYG W 10-0 5 5 2 3 2 0 0 4 0 0
Mickey Owen 7/24/1937 BRO W 20-2 4 4 0 2 0 0 0 5 0 0
Spud Davis 9/11/1935 PHI W 10-2 3 3 1 3 0 1 1 5 0 0
Bill DeLancey 7/18/1935 BSN W 13-3 5 5 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 1
Bill DeLancey 9/30/1934 CIN W 9-0 5 4 1 3 0 0 1 4 1 1
Spud Davis 7/29/1934 PIT W 9-5 5 5 1 2 0 0 1 4 0 0
Spud Davis 7/7/1934 CIN W 10-4 5 5 1 4 2 0 1 5 0 0
Bill DeLancey 1934-05-30 (1) CIN W 9-6 5 5 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1
Spud Davis 4/26/1934 PIT W 10-1 5 5 2 3 1 0 1 4 0 0
Gus Mancuso 6/29/1932 CIN W 10-9 5 5 1 3 2 0 0 4 0 0
Gus Mancuso 1931-07-04 (1) PIT L 8-9 6 5 1 1 0 0 0 4 1 0
Jimmie Wilson 4/18/1931 CHC W 7-5 5 4 0 2 1 0 0 4 1 1
Gus Mancuso 9/23/1930 PHI W 19-16 6 6 3 3 2 0 0 4 0 0
Gus Mancuso 8/22/1930 PHI W 10-8 5 4 0 2 1 0 0 4 1 0
Jimmie Wilson 1930-08-17 (2) NYG W 14-4 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0
Jimmie Wilson 7/9/1930 PIT W 7-6 4 4 1 2 1 1 0 4 0 0
Jimmie Wilson 8/3/1929 BSN W 7-5 2 2 1 2 2 0 0 4 0 0
Jimmie Wilson 7/13/1928 NYG W 11-6 5 4 0 2 1 0 0 4 1 0
Frank Snyder 9/19/1927 PHI W 12-5 4 4 0 3 0 0 0 5 0 0
Johnny Schulte 5/29/1927 CIN W 11-3 5 5 1 3 0 0 0 4 0 0
Bob O’Farrell 5/21/1926 PHI W 12-4 5 4 2 3 2 1 0 4 1 0
Mike Gonzalez 4/29/1924 CIN W 6-3 4 4 0 2 2 0 0 4 0 1
Eddie Ainsmith 4/28/1922 CHC W 11-3 4 3 1 2 0 0 1 4 1 0
Verne Clemons 8/23/1921 NYG W 10-7 4 4 0 3 1 0 0 5 0 0
Verne Clemons 8/7/1921 BSN W 11-0 5 4 1 3 0 0 0 4 1 0
Verne Clemons 6/10/1920 BRO W 9-3 4 4 0 2 0 0 0 4 0 0

Follow me on Twitter.Follow The Cardinal Nation Blog on Facebook.

138 Responses to “Molina snaps out of it”

  1. crdswmn says:

    Yadi has a 3 game hitting streak. :)

  2. CardFanSince57 says:

    It’s one thing to drive in runs and quite another to be the difference in a game. Were it not for his 4 RBI on Friday, we would have been tied and forced to go into extra innings. Not only that, Yadier had figured in both of today’s run-scoring rallies. Indeed, Yadier Molina is climbing out of his slump in a resounding and most meaningful way!

  3. blingboy says:

    Well 57, if Yadi keeps it up I guess we will have someone reminding us who was right all along.

    Colby looked rather bad today. Must be that tired leg syndrome. I’m going to try using that to get out of mowing the lawn tomorrow. I wish the batting fairy would show back up with milk and cookies and set him to rights again.

    I’m guessing Brendan might start.

  4. crdswmn says:

    “Well 57, if Yadi keeps it up I guess we will have someone reminding us who was right all along.”—Huh? Who? :)

  5. CardFanSince57 says:

    As hard as we rode Yadier, blingboy, I suppose we deserve crdswmn’s justifiable gloating!

  6. CardFanSince57 says:

    “Colby looked rather bad today”?

    Here are the chief offense stats of the Los Angeles series so far…
    Most H – 5 Holliday/Molina
    Most R – 3 Pujols
    Most BB – 4 Holliday
    Most SO – 5 Rasmus
    Most LOB – 9 Rasmus, 7 Pujols, 5 Holliday

    There have been only 7 extra base hits and Molina is the only one to homer

    Average (those with at least 9 AB)…
    .555 Holliday
    .455 Molina
    .364 Lopez
    .308 Pujols
    .181 Rasmus

  7. blingboy says:

    Just as I suspected 57, nice work.

    With Supp going today, we need everybody to leave the dolls and teacups at home and show up with bats and gloves.

  8. CardFanSince57 says:

    It shall be incumbent upon our boppers to supply the difference today…
    Hitherto in this series, the offense has been doing the job without any long ball clout from our Big Boppers. Yesterday, their 2 runs were all that was needed: But then, we had Adam on the mound and not Jeff. The “bottom line” today, based on all 5 of Suppan’s appearances, is the absolute necessity for us to score at least 5 runs. Since the small-ballers cannot be expected to manufacture the 7 and 8 runs that they did on Thursday and Friday (respectively), it shall be incumbent upon Colby, Albert and Matt to supply the difference today.

    Vincente Padilla has been awesome, not giving-up more than 2 runs in each of his last four starts! While righties are batting .274 against him, he is death on lefties (.137)! On the other hand, Jeff Suppan represents nothing more than Batting Practice to both righties (.368) and lefties (.365)! What is worse, he’s given up a home run in all, but one, of his 5 brief appearances. Assuming that our small-ballers will succeed in tapping Padilla for the 2 runs that he usually allows, it shall be incumbent indeed upon Colby, Albert and Matt to supply the difference today.

  9. blingboy says:

    Maybe we’ll see Winn, Craig and Miles.

  10. CardFanSince57 says:

    In deference to Padilla’s mastery over lefties, I would not be a bit surprised to see Winn starting in Centerfield, Craig starting in Rightfield and Miles starting at 2nd Base…

  11. CardFanSince57 says:

    At a most crucial juncture, this must be the weakest line-up that Tony has presented in quite a while! With Yadier finally revving-up, he takes him out! On a day of most desperate need of the long ball, he takes Albert out! On a day when we need the least risk of a light-hitter, he takes Tyler out and inserts Ryan! My! MY! There must surely be all kinds of things going on the mind of a wizard that are beyond my grasp…

    I can only hope that the sorry line-up represents a classic ESPN mistake…

    3b Lopez
    cf Jay
    1b Craig
    lf Holliday
    rf Winn
    2b Schumaker
    c LaRue
    p Suppan
    ss Ryan

  12. crdswmn says:

    I expected Yadi not to play. But this lineup looks like TLR decided he wanted to lose.

  13. CardFanSince57 says:

    Amen, crdswmn… Sending our weakest pitcher out with the weakest line-up possible to support him is tantamount to sending a soldier out to the battlefield with no weapons! Is it that Tony wants to guarantee Suppan’s failure or is it that Tony doesn’t want to embarrass Joe Torre with a four game sweep? Can it possibly be that Tony wants to insult those who purchased a ticket for this Sunday game, by denying them the pleasure of seeing two of the team’s greatest stars?

  14. crdswmn says:

    After studying the lineup I can see some reasoning behind it. Albert has not been his best during this series. Neither has Colby. TLR frequently gives Yadi a rest, most often on Sunday games and when Suppan is pitching. The reason for Brendan starting is anybody’s guess.

    However, just because I can see some logic behind it doesn’t mean I like it. I think it is a recipe for disaster. At this juncture, disaster is the last thing we need.

  15. CardFanSince57 says:

    I can see taking Colby out, not because of poor performance, but because Padilla is so strong against lefties. The logical choice, then, would be to place Winn in Centerfield. While it is true that Albert hasn’t been at his best, this particular game is much too crucial (for several reasons) to justify taking him out. This line-up definitely represents “a recipe for disaster” and we can only hope that our guys are not too demoralized to find some way to surmount the manager’s gross lapse in judgment…

  16. CardFanSince57 says:

    If YOU were at Busch stadium this afternoon, having spent a small fortune of your hard-earned money to cheer your team, how happy and understanding would you be?

  17. crdswmn says:

    I would be very disappointed 57. I had doubts about our ability to win this game before. After seeing this lineup. I am resigned to it.

  18. CardFanSince57 says:

    I had hopes for this game, crdswmn, but those hopes have been trashed… We will nevertheless watch whatever horrors that will likely unfold, because we are true fans.

  19. CardFanSince57 says:

    While it is true that the loss of poor Loney represents a blow to the Dodgers, he is by no means the warp and woof of that team. The Dodgers are bona fide competitors, with depth, and are just as formidable today as they were yesterday…

  20. CardFanSince57 says:

    So far (two batters), Jeff has been successful in keeping the pitches down…

  21. CardFanSince57 says:

    Despite the fly-ball out, a 7-pitch first inning is a very encouraging start!

  22. crdswmn says:

    Loney expected to play but it was wise for the Dodgers to keep him out.

    I’m a cynic. The disaster will occur soon enough.

  23. CardFanSince57 says:

    That was a 10-pitch At Bat: Jon (a lefty) is not supposed to put up such a battle against the mighty Padilla.

  24. CardFanSince57 says:

    I’m liking those fly-ball outs: It’s just a matter of time until they start fallin’ where they ain’t…

  25. CardFanSince57 says:

    Remember Jeff’s 7-pitch first inning? That was an 8-pitch At Bat (resulting in a dangerous fly-ball out deep into rightfield)…

  26. CardFanSince57 says:

    Belliard’s mannerisms remind me of a gangster street-thug: For some reason, I am surprised that his cap is not on backyard and he’s not wearing his britches down over his butt…

  27. CardFanSince57 says:

    The question is, with a ground-out to second, how did DeWitt wind-up on second?

  28. CardFanSince57 says:

    With my comments about Belliard, did I just commit a classic Howard Cosell?

  29. crdswmn says:

    I won’t tell anyone 57.

  30. CardFanSince57 says:

    The 7-pitch inning was followed-up by a 19-pitch inning, but there was no harm done: So far, so good…

  31. CardFanSince57 says:

    That was Matt’s 5th walk of the series…

  32. CardFanSince57 says:

    Winn does most of his damage against righties: Let’s hope this is one of his good days…

  33. CariocaCardinal says:

    CrIag has been really unlucky this year but a .087 hitting 3rd?

  34. CardFanSince57 says:

    How was it possible for Matt to get doubled off first? Damn it!

  35. CardFanSince57 says:

    Good observation, crdswmn! A .087 hitting third is only one of the many questionable things about this particular sorry line-up…

  36. blingboy says:

    The lineup isn’t so bad. Craig can singles as well as Albert. Winn strikes out less than Colby. Larue is hitting 36 pts less than Yadi. I would have used Miles instead of Skip against the lefty.

  37. CardFanSince57 says:

    The decent thing about that 5-pitch strikeout of the catcher (a weak hitter) is that all the pitches were low… It appears that Jeff is finally responding to Duncan’s wisdom…

  38. CardFanSince57 says:

    I love your optimism and contagious cognizant dissonance, blingboy!

  39. blingboy says:

    “The question is, with a ground-out to second, how did DeWitt wind-up on second?”

    It was a DP but the runner beat the throw at second.

  40. CardFanSince57 says:

    Although Jeff’s pitch count is high, I am seeing a distinct improvement (emanating from the fact that he is now keeping most of his pitches low)…

  41. blingboy says:

    I don’t know what cognizant dissonance is 57, if it means smart, rich and good looking I’m afraid you struck out.

  42. CardFanSince57 says:

    I was afraid that the answer would be such, blingboy…

  43. CardFanSince57 says:

    Yeah, that’s PRECISELY what it is and, yeah, I done struck out!

  44. CardFanSince57 says:

    Actually, cognizant dissonance = “making lemonade from lemons” and “the attempt to make something positive from something which is terribly negative”

  45. CardFanSince57 says:

    My mentality is wide-open for such things as Gallows Humor and cognitive dissonance: That’s why I remarked that it was “contagious”!

  46. crdswmn says:

    Damn man at the door made me miss the last at bat. What did Lopez do?

  47. blingboy says:

    Meek grounder to second

  48. blingboy says:

    Suppan threw a 68 mph pitch, last inning Padilla threw one 58.

  49. CardFanSince57 says:

    He grounded out, crdswmn…

  50. CardFanSince57 says:

    I absolutely LOVE that description; “meek grounder”!!!

  51. crdswmn says:

    It was nice to see Brendan get a hit. Too bad it was wasted.

  52. CardFanSince57 says:

    Wow! We actually executed a DP!

  53. blingboy says:

    Cards turned a nice DP there 57. Craig fielded it and stepped on the base then threw to second for the tag. Looked like Albert out there.

  54. CardFanSince57 says:

    Isn’t it ironic that the ONLY Cardinal hit was made by the weakest Cardinal hitter? There must be some sort of commentary somewhere in that fact…

  55. CardFanSince57 says:

    Now, let’s see Craig do an Albert at the plate, as well as he does an Albert on the field…

  56. blingboy says:

    Wouldn’t it be sweet if Brendan were starting to snap out of it. From here on out, if we had a .285 hitting gold glove SS what a difference that would make.

  57. CardFanSince57 says:

    ‘Twould be sweet indeed!

    By the way, Craig’s fly-ball deep into Centerfield was the furthest hit ball so far today…

  58. blingboy says:

    Padilla is throwing from 96 mph down to 60.

  59. CardFanSince57 says:

    That was Matt’s 6th walk of the series…

  60. CardFanSince57 says:

    Padilla is evidently a master of the change-up

  61. crdswmn says:

    Another walk by Matt wasted.

  62. CardFanSince57 says:

    When you get too hungry, you attempt a steal when there are two outs…

  63. blingboy says:

    Supp floated one in to Belliard at the letters and out over the plate. Got spanked good.

    Got Belliard on the force, hit to slow to get the DP.

  64. blingboy says:

    Got that one up to Ellis too. Starting to get a little scary here.

  65. blingboy says:

    57, Lopez was in against the bunt, Padilla hit a high bouncer down the line that bounced too high for Lopez and went on down towards the corner and was cut off by Holliday to keep the second runner from scoring.

    Just now Winn came on strong, made the catch in good position ready to throw so the runner stayed at third.

  66. crdswmn says:

    it could be worse.

  67. blingboy says:

    Nice play by Skip on a grounder up the middle, just got him at first. Really a heck of a job by all getting out of that with just one run.

    One run through five. Supp did his job.

  68. CardFanSince57 says:

    Ya gotta admit, this has been Jeff’s best outing so far: He’s only given-up one run in 5 innings. The shame is that we are facing a pitcher who is shutting us out on a one-hitter…

  69. JumboShrimp says:

    Including Game 3 of last year’s playoff, Padilla has now shut out the Cards at home for 11 innings on 5 hits. He is a handful.

  70. blingboy says:

    That was a 51 mph curve ball that got Skip. Looked like a bloop pitch.

  71. CardFanSince57 says:

    When it comes to lefties, Padilla chews ‘em up and spits ‘em out…

  72. CardFanSince57 says:

    That was Colby’s 6th strikeout of the series…

  73. blingboy says:

    We are going for a lot of pitches out of the zone.

  74. CardFanSince57 says:

    A bases-loaded walk rally! I dare you to walk Matt NOW, Padilla!

  75. blingboy says:

    I’ll have a frosty one, with salami on the side.

  76. crdswmn says:

    Why did Matt swing at the first pitch? Dammit.

  77. blingboy says:

    Pshawwwwwwww

  78. blingboy says:

    right on crdswmn, guy can’t throw strikes

  79. CardFanSince57 says:

    THAT, my friends, was a MAJOR disappointment!

  80. CardFanSince57 says:

    This is the day that we needed our Boppers most to finally do their thing. Tony gives poor Jeff only one Bopper and what does he do?

  81. CardFanSince57 says:

    This is not a very convenient time for Mitchell to have an overdue bad outing…

  82. crdswmn says:

    At least the Reds lost.

  83. CardFanSince57 says:

    Aye, since Tony won’t help us, lo, we turn to the Rockies…

  84. blingboy says:

    “Roy Oswalt, maybe the most accomplished pitcher available on the trade market, was hit in the ankle with a line drive early in his Sunday start. He tried to continue, but couldn’t. It is unknown at this point if the injury is a bruise or something worse”

    bnd.com

  85. CardFanSince57 says:

    I’m sure that the ramifications of that are more disturbing for him personally, than for any of the clubs trying to arrange for his salary…

  86. CardFanSince57 says:

    MacLane’s performance was promising…

  87. CardFanSince57 says:

    Perhaps we can now mount another walk-a-thon and Matt will redeem himself…

  88. crdswmn says:

    57, I love your optimism. I wish I had it.

  89. CardFanSince57 says:

    “Twas time for Craig to open himself a can o’ Kick Ass!

  90. crdswmn says:

    A double will work.

  91. CardFanSince57 says:

    Matt would do well to follow suit…

  92. CardFanSince57 says:

    Winn did what Matt could not…

  93. CardFanSince57 says:

    All it takes now, LaRue, is a measly single to tie it up!

  94. CardFanSince57 says:

    Albert! Albert! Albert!

  95. CariocaCardinal says:

    Do you put mcClane back out there now that we have a chanced?

  96. crdswmn says:

    That was exciting at any rate.

  97. CardFanSince57 says:

    Our Boppers just can’t rise to the occasion…

  98. CardFanSince57 says:

    Which will it be; a win for Franky or a loss for Jeff?

  99. CardFanSince57 says:

    Just think; we could have had the services of Yadier to begin with…

  100. blingboy says:

    Need a pinch runner but our emergency catcher is on the DL

  101. blingboy says:

    So far this game I have called both Matt and Albert everything but a child of god. Clutchless chokemeisters.

  102. CardFanSince57 says:

    A single, two walks and a sacrifice were far more than we could have expected from Brendan… Our B-Teamers have fought well (against overwhelming odds)…

  103. CardFanSince57 says:

    During the first two-thirds of the game, when Matt was the lone Bopper, he miserably blew two golden opportunities. Then, very late (too late) in the game, Albert stepped-up and followed-suit…

  104. CardFanSince57 says:

    Craig scraped-out what was left in his can o’ Kick Ass…

  105. CardFanSince57 says:

    Shall Matt now (finally!) redeem himself with a walk-off?

  106. crdswmn says:

    Well I’ll be damned.

  107. CardFanSince57 says:

    Thanks to Tony, the pitcher who should have won did not… No thanks to Tony, the game was won and we secured our second sweep of the season. Aye, two down and only eight to go!

  108. CardFanSince57 says:

    I would imagine that Big Bad Broxton has about the same pathetic look on his face as when the Yankees destroyed him during the last Interleague game of the season…

  109. crdswmn says:

    Happy birthday for Allen Craig. No happy birthday for Joe Torre.

  110. CardFanSince57 says:

    Yeah, Matt finally did what he is paid to do, but we can thank our B-Teamers for this one.

  111. crdswmn says:

    The thing I hate about FSM not covering is no post-game show.

  112. CardFanSince57 says:

    I would imagine that Allen’s got himself a can o’ Kick Ass for every game that he plays. I am really, really impressed with the guy…

  113. CardFanSince57 says:

    We’re ridin’ a 5 game winning streak! Now that we paid the Dodgers back for sweeping us, we’ve got a nasty pay-back waitin’ for the Fillies…

  114. crdswmn says:

    4 game hitting streak for Yadi. You know I have to rub it in. :)

  115. CardFanSince57 says:

    Well, it certainly stings good and you can quit it some more!

  116. blingboy says:

    Glorious ! ! First place, how sweet it is.

  117. blingboy says:

    Yadi has been superb. Matt redeemed himself nicely. Jay and Craig seem to be clutch performers. Allen seems like a different guy from the one we saw. Brendan seems to be doing a Lazarus.

  118. JumboShrimp says:

    Good win for TLR today. Replaced Albert with Craig, who drives in 3. Suppan gives up only 1 run in 6 innings. Low average B. Ryan chipped in. Tony’s faith in players was rewarded.

  119. crdswmn says:

    I haven’t had this much fun since our walk-off win against the Dbacks. :)

  120. blingboy says:

    Once again the starting pitching was adequate, as it has been all year both before and after the injuries. Almost all the losses have been due to either lack of clutch hitting, or much less often, due to the pen not performing.

    Our pen is not bad compared to others, by any means. As to the offense in general, and clutch hitting in particular, only time will tell. Some cold guys are heating up. On the other hand, Albert is still not the Albert of prior to last August, Matt is still not the fearsome slugger in the cleanup spot, Luddy remains on the shelf, and Colby is all messed up. That is four key offensive weapons still not up to par. Fortunatly, others have stepped up, but that cannot be expected to continue.

  121. RCWarrior says:

    Twas a good win and a nice sweep.

  122. blingboy says:

    I hope it keeps up since I’ll be down there tomorrow. I see we have Salas again and no MacLane.

  123. CardFanSince57 says:

    As I watch the enemy on ESPN tonight, the delightful thought occurs to me that we will not be facing Halladay. All their starters will be 4.40+ ERA, except for Hamels at the very end (3.78). It is also very encouraging to see what the Flubs have done to them after their sweep of the Reds. Like blingboy said, despite the fact that our three Boppers ain’t boppin’, everybody else is heating up and contributing. Indeed, we swept the Dodgers with superb pitching supported by a vigorous group of “B-Teamers”. I’ve never felt more optimistic about our guys…

  124. blingboy says:

    Hawksworth (3-5) Kendrick (5-3)
    Carpenter (10-3) Moyer (9-9)
    Garcia (8-4) Blanton (3-5)
    Wainwright (14-5) Hamels (7-7)

    I had just been looking at the pitching too 57. I like it. Wonder how we will do against the ancient one.

  125. crdswmn says:

    Halladay isn’t pitching so well so far. Flubs are ahead already 4-0. To be fair, one of the runs was scored because of a bad throw by the catcher.

  126. blingboy says:

    The scary thing is the Phillies lineup will awaken at some point, probably with a vengence. But even so, would be unlikely to rack up big numbers against Carp or Wainy. Could make things tough on Hawk and Jaime.

  127. CardFanSince57 says:

    I was thinking the same thing… But then again, Philly’s offensive depth is no greater than the Dodgers. If tomorrow’s and Wednesday’s games become slugfests and our Boppers continue to be impotent, our guys have demonstrated that they are yet capable of racking up at least 5 runs. On the other hand, if our Boppers should awaken (also “with a vengeance”), the Fillies won’t have a prayer… I am beginning to believe that we really are the best in the National League and that we really can take it to the Yanks.

  128. blingboy says:

    We didn’t do much against Kendrick and Hammels back in May.

  129. crdswmn says:

    We didn’t do much of anything against anybody back in May BB. :)

  130. crdswmn says:

    I hope the Phils play against us like they are playing against the Flubs.

  131. blingboy says:

    Well that’s a good point crdswmn, we have been better lately and the Phills have been worse.

    I had been thinking since Yadi perked up after we’d been ripping him, maybe we ought to get after Colby again. Maybe its like voodoo or something. I know he’s got a sore leg but he was K-ing alot before that. Once Luddy comes back Luddy and Colby are going to have to keep up with Jay and Craig. For that matter, Albert will need to do something besides plunk out singles. Craig can do that for a lot less money. Today’s game is a reminder what some clutch hitting in the three spot can mean, and the sad fact is we haven’t been getting it with any regularilty.

    Also, nobody mentioned that Flip went Ofer 5. Its something to win when your leadoff man doesn’t get on at all.

  132. crdswmn says:

    BB- Somehow I don’t think RC would appreciate us sticking pins in Colby dolls. :)

  133. WestCoastbirdWatcher says:

    Good work by everyone creating the environment for the sweep……….

    Molina seems to have shaken of the All Star pressure……..that was expected……….. how did it feel to win without AP? I will review the games when I have a moment. I watched the Friday game on a 32sq food high definition projection system. I felt like I need a glove standing that close.

  134. WestCoastbirdWatcher says:

    BB, Notice Tony didn’t move MH…………………. no dangerous precedents.

  135. blingboy says:

    Matt and Albert have mostly been footnotes in the post break winning streak. That even with Matt driving in the winner today.

    Craig wasn’t supposed to drive in three and look good in the field. Let us not hold our breath until his next start at first.

    For the Philly series, I predict we will blow them out big once or twice, and Albert will fatten up with superfluous RBIs. Man, he really got his pants pulled down in front of everyone today.

  136. blingboy says:

    I have not noticed RC getting all sideways over it in the past. I’m sure if it got mean spirited it would be different. It is, after all, not our fault when the youngster stinks up the joint.

  137. CardFanSince57 says:

    “I have not noticed RC getting all sideways over it in the past”

    I believe that Warrior is a fellow concerned Cardinal fan who happens to be the father of one of the players. He joined-in with our hammering of Yadier, only because he knew that we weren’t Yadier-haters. I strongly suspect that he would join-in with our hammering of Colby, only because he knows that we love the guy too. What would Warrior truly say of the “Strike Out King” of the Dodger series? Of our three Boppers, in the post-break climate, Colby has been contributing much less than Albert and Matt!

  138. CardFanSince57 says:

    “Matt and Albert have mostly been footnotes in the post break winning streak”

    Who would have ever thought that we would depend upon the offense of our small-ballers and the B-Team for an incredible four-game sweep of the Los Angeles Dodgers? Yesterday, with our Lead Off man going “Oh, for…!”, the accent was upon the B-Team (led by the birthday boy, Allen Craig).

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.